<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Articles to Read, Things to Know</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ithinkthereforeib.edublogs.org/2009/05/28/articles-to-read-things-to-know/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ithinkthereforeib.edublogs.org/2009/05/28/articles-to-read-things-to-know/</link>
	<description>- contemplating - cogitating - brooding over - considering - reflecting on - introspecting - deliberating - ruminating - meditating - mulling over - musing on - visualising - brainstorming - envisaging - dreaming of - and putting on the thinking hat 'til we are lost in thought</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:53:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mario1337</title>
		<link>http://ithinkthereforeib.edublogs.org/2009/05/28/articles-to-read-things-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>mario1337</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ithinkthereforeib.edublogs.org/?p=173#comment-137</guid>
		<description>I read the math one. Didn&#039;t like it. I think his point is not as connected to mathematics as I would like it to be in order to be amazed. He is just drawing conclusions from love and turning them into patterns, which he then connects to math. Problem is, math is made of patterns, but so is pretty much everything else. So making a connection between patterns of relationships and math doesn&#039;t really work, in my view point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the math one. Didn&#8217;t like it. I think his point is not as connected to mathematics as I would like it to be in order to be amazed. He is just drawing conclusions from love and turning them into patterns, which he then connects to math. Problem is, math is made of patterns, but so is pretty much everything else. So making a connection between patterns of relationships and math doesn&#8217;t really work, in my view point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
